Legal Opinion

Keim v. Village of Bloomington

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1930No. 26916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thomsen, District Judge.

This action is brought under section 4263, Comp. St. 1922, to detach farm land of the plaintiff from the Village of Bloomington. By detachment, the record shows, plaintiff would save albout $18 a year, the amount of village tax he is now required to pay. A similar action was brought, by a former owner of the land during 1919, which action terminated on March 25, 1920, by a decree in favor of the village. On the trial of the present case the court found that the action brought by the former owner is an adjudication of the present action; that no new facts entitling…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Vestal v. Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  2. Sorensen v. SorensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  3. City of Denver v. CoulehanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  4. State ex rel. Kennedy v. BroatchNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Bisenius v. City of RandolphNebraska Supreme Court · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Independent Stock Farm v. StevensNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Carter v. ParsonsNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Hustead v. Village of PhillipsNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Lee v. City of HarvardNebraska Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API