Legal Opinion

Sorensen v. Sorensen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1903No. 12,753PublishedCited by 47 opinions

Error to the district court for Valley county: James N. Paul, District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Pound, C.

A general statement of the facts out of which this controversy arises may he found in an. opinion rendered in another branch of the same proceeding. Sorensen v. Sorensen, 56 Neb. 729. When the cause was here before, the question was, who was entitled to appointment as administrator of the estate? After that question had been determined and the claims of the alleged widow disposed of, the petitioners in the present case, who are brothers and children of a deceased brother and sister of the intestate, filed a petition in the county court praying for distribution of the estate to them…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Seebrock v. FedawaNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Heilman v. ShanklinIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Bush v. WathenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  4. Sorensen v. SorensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Henriques v. Yale UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Hewitt v. HewittIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Estate of BloomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. In Re Estate of SoederOhio Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Moeller, McPherrin & Judd v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Fischer v. SklenarNebraska Supreme Court · 1917

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API