Legal Opinion

Bisenius v. City of Randolph

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1908No. 15,127PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Cedar county: Cut T. Craves, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Root, C.

Defendant is a municipal corporation having more thau 1,000 and less than 5,000 inhabitants. Plaintiff owns and occupies a tract of land containing about 150 acres within and contiguous to the boundary of said city, and also owns another parcel of real estate of about 60 acres in like situation, except that he does not reside thereon. Plaintiff brought this action under section 8978, Ann. St. 1907, to have said territory disconnected from the defendant corporation. In addition to alleging the foregoing facts, he stated that said lands were unplatted, and that at all times since their…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Commissioners of Laramie County v. COMMISSIONERS OF ALBANY COUNTYSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. City of Galesburg v. HawkinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Forsythe v. City of HammondIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. City of Wahoo v. DickinsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  5. State ex rel. Hammond v. DimondNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Pendergast v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  2. Searle v. YensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Nickel v. School Board of AxtellNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Rowe v. RayNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  5. In re Dexter-Greenfield Drainage Dist.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1915

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API