Legal Opinion

Hustead v. Village of Phillips

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1936No. 29650PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.

Dwight L. Hustead instituted this action seeking to have 28.14 acres of unoccupied, agricultural land, theretofore embraced in the corporate limits of the village of Phillips, detached therefrom. By his amended petition, filed under the provisions of section 17-412, Comp. St. 1929, he set forth the strictly agricultural character of the land involved; alleged that it received no benefits from the village 'or from the utilities operated by it; that an excessive municipal tax was imposed upon it; and that justice and equity required that this territory be disconnected from the village.

To this…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bisenius v. City of RandolphNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Witham v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Village of Osmond v. SmathersNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Gregory v. Village of FranklinNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Michaelson v. TildenNebraska Supreme Court · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ratigan v. DavisNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
  2. United States v. City of Bellevue, NebraskaDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1971
  3. Kuebler v. City of KearneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Runyan v. Village of OngNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Portland General Electric Co. v. City of EstacadaOregon Supreme Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API