Lee v. City of Harvard
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.
This is an equitable action to detach a tract of 9.28 acres from the City of Harvard. The city objected to its being detached, but the trial court found that the property received no special benefit from the city and that justice and equity required that it be detached, from which judgment the City of Harvard appealed.
The petition of George E. Lee sets out that he is the sole owner and in possession of a tract of land consisting of 9.28 acres, which was incorporated in the City of Harvard, but alleges that the land was not laid out in town lots or blocks, and is used exclusively for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bisenius v. City of RandolphNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
- Witham v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
- Village of Osmond v. SmathersNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
- Sole v. City of GenevaNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
- Joerger v. HeightsNebraska Supreme Court · 1915
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kuebler v. City of KearneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
- Swanson v. City of Fairfield, Clay CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
- Egan v. Village of Meadow GroveNebraska Supreme Court · 1954