Joint Highway Dist. No. 13 v. Hinman
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.
The petitioner, Joint Highway District No. 13, hereinafter-referred to as the “District”, was formed in 1928 by the concurrent action of the boards of supervisors of Alameda and Contra Costa Counties, for the purpose of constructing a public highway and tunnel, part of which is in each of those counties, and generally described as beginning in the city of Oakland and running thence northeasterly to, under and through the Contra Costa hills, and connecting with an existing state highway running to Lafayette and Walnut Creek in Contra Costa County. Respondent is treasurer of the District.
The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Golden Gate Bridge & Highway District v. FeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Lafayette, Muncie, & Bloomington Rail Road v. GeigerIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
- Gilson v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Memphis & Charleston Railway Co. v. PaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Younger v. County of El DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- The Housing Authority v. DockweilerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- County of Mariposa v. Merced Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Santa Barbara County Water Agency v. All Persons & PartiesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- People v. Spring Valley Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.