Legal Opinion

Scott Stamp Etc. Co., Ltd. v. Leake

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 10, 1908No. Civ. No. 523PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County, and from an order denying a new trial. Henry A. Melvin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from the judgment and from the order denying its motion for a new trial.

The facts are undisputed and are briefly as follows: On May 10, 1900, at New York, Mrs. Joseph Dunsmuir bought from the plaintiff merchandise at agreed prices amounting to $1,482.33. June 2, 1901, she died without having paid for it. She left a will which was admitted to probate, and letters testamentary were issued thereon on July 15, 1901. Before then, on June 27th, the claim of plaintiff was prepared and sworn to at New York and sent out to San Francisco, where it came into the hands of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Etchas v. OrenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. McGrath v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Lichtenberg v. McGlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Barclay v. BlackintonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Landis v. WoodmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Western States Life Ins. Co. v. LockwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Berger v. O'HEARNCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Ullman Co. v. AdlerMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Gee Chong Pong v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  5. Kohn v. RupleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API