Legal Opinion

Kohn v. Rupley

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 15, 1921No. Civ. No. 2341PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

Plaintiff, being the owner of a promissory note and mortgage executed by the testator, presented his claim for the amount due thereon more than three months prior to the time the same would have become barred by the statute of limitations. The executor and the judge of the superior court allowed the claim a few days after it had apparently become barred. Thereafter, as required by law, the executor rendered, “a full account and report of his administration.” The report contained a list of claims allowed and filed, among which was plaintiff’s claim with a statement of the name of' the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. In Re Estate of BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. In Re Estate of HellierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Estate of McDougaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Ex parte MoranCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Faias v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. BurdetteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  3. In Re Tolleson's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Farley v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Van Zandt v. GardnerArizona Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API