Legal Opinion
Landis v. Woodman
California Supreme Court
Decided October 26, 1899No. Sac. No. 639PublishedCited by 15 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Butte County. John C. Gray, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
—Plaintiff presented a claim against the estate of A. Fuller, deceased, to the administrator. This claim was in the following form and was rejected:
“The undersigned creditor of A. Fuller, deceased, presents his claim against the estate of said deceased for approval, to wit:
“Estate of A. Fuller, Deceased, to A. J. Landis, Debtor.
“To principal promissory note, dated June 25, 1897, hereto attached, fifteen thousand dollars.
“To interest on same from June 25, 1897, at seven per cent per annum, to March 25, 1898, seven hundred and eighty-seveij. and 50-100 dollars.
“Which note is in the words and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Wolfe v. WilseyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
3Cited by15 opinions
- Raleigh v. First Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1900
- Crocker-Woolworth National Bank v. CarleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Thompson v. OrenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- People v. LandisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- State Ex Rel. Paramount Publix Corp. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1931
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.