Legal Opinion

In re C.R. Bard, Inc. Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided July 12, 2012No. 2:10-md-2187PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*379MEMORANDUM OPINION AND PRETRIAL ORDER #44

(Tissue Science Laboratories Ltd.’s Motion to Quash Subpoena to Produce Documents, ECF No. 255)

MARY E. STANLEY, United States Magistrate Judge.

In this multi-district litigation (“MDL”) concerning products used to repair pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence, on April 23, 2012, the plaintiffs served a subpoena on Instrument Management Associates, L.L.C. (“IMA”), through its registered agent for service, Thomas C. Powell, to produce documents relating to two specifically named civil actions and to other matters involving defendant Tissue…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Directv, Inc. v. PuccinelliDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
  2. Windsor v. MartindaleDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1997
  3. Grumman Aerospace Corp. v. Titanium Metals Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1981
  4. Liberty Media Holdings, LLC v. Swarn Sharing Hash File AE340D0560129AFEE8D78CE07F2394C7 B5BC9C05District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
  5. U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. JamesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Costner v. Fat Burgers Sports Bar & Grill, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2023
  2. Darius Danzy v. CSX Transportation Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2026
  3. Goldstein v. HindleDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
  4. Harris v. VanderburgDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2021
  5. Hicks v. Houston Baptist UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API