Legal Opinion
Goldstein v. Hindle
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 14, 2025No. 1:21-cv-03124Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND CHAMBERS OF 101 WEST LOMBARD STREET CHELSEA J. CRAWFORD BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21201 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MDD_CJCChambers@mdd.uscourts.gov (410) 962-4560 July 14, 2025 MEMORANDUM TO PARTIES RE: Goldstein, et al. v. Hindle, Civil Action No. CJC-21-3124 Dear Parties, Now pending before the Court are several motions, which for ease of reference, are grouped into three categories: (1) motions to compel; (2) a motion to quash subpoena; and (3) motions for sanctions. Each group is discussed in turn, below. I. Motions to Compel Plaintiffs have…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Lone Star Steakhouse & Saloon, Incorporated Max Shayne, Incorporated v. Alpha of Virginia, Incorporated, D/B/A Lone Star GrillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Larouche v. National Broadcasting Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina v. Jemsek Clinic, P.A.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- In re C.R. Bard, Inc. Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.