Legal Opinion

Harris v. Vanderburg

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided January 11, 2021No. 4:19-cv-00111Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION No. 4:19-CV-111-D WILLIAM HARRIS and PHYLLIS ) HARRIS, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) OORDER ) MARY JANE VANDERBURG, ) DOUGLAS MATTHEW GURKINS, ) REMCO EAST, INC., and MARY ) GRACE BISHOP, ) ) Defendants. ) This matter is before the court on Defendant Vanderburg’s motion to quash, motion for protective order, and objections to a Rule 45 subpoena issued by Plaintiffs to a nonparty, as amended. [DE ##64, 66]. These matters have been referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. AF Holdings, LLC v. Does 1-1058Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  3. Michael Anthony Stamathis v. Flying J, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation David L. HansenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
  4. Blount v. Wake Electric Membership Corp.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1993
  5. Schaaf v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API