Legal Opinion

Holliday v. Page

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 23, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, Judge.

Edwin Holliday appeals from the judgment entered following an order denying a motion for post-trial relief requesting a new trial. We affirm.

This civil action was filed as a result of the injuries sustained by Appellant following an automobile accident. The Appellee did not deny liability. The case was submitted to the jury only on the issue of damages. The verdict was for Appellant in the amount of $1,000. Various claims were raised by Appellant in his motions for post-trial relief all of which were denied. 1 Subsequently, this pro se appeal was filed by Appellant.

“We may not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Police Dept. v. GraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Picca v. KrinerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Curran v. Greate Bay Hotel and CasinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Sundlun v. ShoemakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. McDermott v. BiddleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Criswell v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Fillmore v. HillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Rozanc v. UrbanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Graver v. Klein, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API