Legal Opinion

Criswell v. King

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 21, 2003PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice CASTILLE.

The issue on this appeal is whether in order to preserve a claim that a jury verdict is contrary to the weight of the evidence, a party must raise an objection to that verdict prior to the jury’s discharge. We hold that a weight of the evidence challenge need not be proffered before discharge of the jury in order to préserve the challenge for post-verdict and appellate review. Accordingly, we reverse the order of the Superior Court and remand this case for that court to consider the merits of appellee’s appeal.

This case arises from an October 12, 1993, automobile…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Kathleen Madaline Jarvis, Individually and as a Parent and Guardian of Paul Michael Attila Jarvis, a Minor v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  5. Armbruster v. HorowitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SanchezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Samuel-Bassett v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. CollinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Haan, D. and P. v. Wells, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. In re Estate of SmalingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API