Rozanc v. Urbany
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DEL SOLE, Judge:
This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of defendants in an action brought as a result of an automobile collision. Among the claims raised by Appellants is that the jury verdict in this matter was against the weight of the evidence since the evidence was uncontradicted that Kimberly Rozanc suffered some injury in the accident. In reviewing this claim following the filing of post-trial motions the trial court concluded that “plaintiffs contention would be correct,” but the court nevertheless refused to award her relief because it found that the issue had been waived.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Thompson v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Neison v. HinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Picca v. KrinerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Holliday v. PageSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
3Cited by30 opinions
- Criswell v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Majczyk v. OeschSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Mano v. MaddenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Craft v. HetherlySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Daniel v. William R. Drach Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.