Fillmore v. Hill
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Judge.
In this opinion, we are called on to determine whether a trial court may properly deem waived an issue relating to a jury’s problematic, but not inconsistent, verdict because a party failed to object to the verdict prior to the jury’s dismissal by the trial court judge. We hold that under such circumstances, a party’s failure to object prior to the jury’s dismissal does not result in the issue’s waiver. Accordingly, for the following reasons, we reverse the order of the trial court and remand for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
This appeal involves a challenge to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Kiser v. SchulteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Neison v. HinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Boyle v. SteimanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Giovanetti v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Gorski v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Criswell v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Burnhauser v. BumbergerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Hong v. PelagattiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- M.O. v. J.T.R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.