Legal Opinion

Graver v. Klein

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County

Decided May 12, 2005No. 2861 CV 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

CHESLOCK, J,

This matter is before the court on plaintiffs Herbert H. Graver and Anna *549Graver’s motion for post-trial relief. For the reasons set forth below, we deny their motion for new trial.

A concise summary of the facts are as follows: On May 12,1998, plaintiff Herbert H. Graver was admitted to Pocono Medical Center with a preoperative diagnosis of cellulites and intramuscular abscess of the left leg. Defendant Lawrence Klein M.D. performed three surgical procedures on Graver. Due to the failure of the wound to heal and the worsening condition of Graver, he was taken to Lehigh Valley…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Harman Ex Rel. Harman v. BorahSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Neison v. HinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Morrison v. Com., Dept. of Pub. WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Davis v. MullenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Criswell v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API