Legal Opinion

Philadelphia Police Dept. v. Gray

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 3, 1993No. 22 and 131 E.D. Appeal Docket 1991PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

The controlling question common to these consolidated appeals is whether the Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act, 42 Pa.C.S. § 8541 et seq., precludes the waiver of governmental immunity found in Philadelphia Code Section 21-701. We will also address an additional question raised in Kathleen Williams v. SEPTA and the City of Philadelphia, which is whether the trial court erred in refusing to enter judgment N.O.V. or grant a new trial against SEPTA in light of the jury’s inconsistent answers to interrogatories.1

These appeals are from orders of the Commonwealth Court.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Mascaro v. Youth Study CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Laudenberger v. Port Auth. of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Tulewicz v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. In Re the Upset Sale of Properties Against Which Delinquent 1981 Taxes Were Returned to the Tax Claim Unit on or About the First Monday of May, 1982Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. McShea v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Criswell v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Kraus v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Straub v. Cherne IndustriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Fillmore v. HillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API