Legal Opinion

Lees v. Bay Area Air Pollution Control District

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 1965No. Civ. 22388PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSalsman, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying a petition for a writ of mandate. Appellants sought to have the superior court declare Regulation 2 of respondent Bay Area Air Pollution Control District (hereafter referred to as the District) unconstitutional or to direct the District to grant them a variance from the regulation.

Appellants first contend that procedural errors, committed at trial and in proceedings before the District’s hearing board, require reversal of the judgment, and second that Regulation 2 of the District is unconstitutional because it confiscates their property without just…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gray v. Reclamation District No. 1500California Supreme Court · 1917
  2. In Re RamerizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Northwestern Laundry v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Pry Corp. of America v. LeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Goldberg v. Paramount Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. Freeman v. Contra Costa County Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Darley v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Morshead v. California Regional Water Quality Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Fallen Leaf Protection Assn. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API