Freeman v. Contra Costa County Water District
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHRISTIAN, J.
Appellants are the owners of residences in the City of Concord served by the water system of respondent Contra Costa County Water District. Each of the appellants maintains on his property a well from which water is drawn for such purposes as gardening and car-washing. Although appellants had not connected their well water systems to the pipes of the district’s public system, the district threatens to terminate service until the affected householders agree to have installed, at their own expense, a “double check valve assembly,” designed to prevent water from the auxiliary…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Goldblatt v. Town of HempsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- In Re RamerizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Beverly Oil Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Lees v. Bay Area Air Pollution Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Farmers Ins. Exchange v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Poverty Resistance Center v. HartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- San Francisco Police Officers' Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.