Legal Opinion
Morshead v. California Regional Water Quality Control Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 21, 1975No. Civ. 34151PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROUSE, J.
Plaintiffs identify themselves as taxpayers, property owners, developers and associations of builders. They appeal a superior court judgment 1 denying their petitions for writs of mandamus. By such petitions, they sought to restrain the enforcement of certain cease and desist orders issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board for the San Francisco Bay Region (hereinafter referred to as the “Regional Board.”). Pursuant to section 13263 of the Water Code, the Regional Board adopted water quality requirements for waste discharges which are pumped indirectly into…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Zahn v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Wilkins v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Gray v. Reclamation District No. 1500California Supreme Court · 1917
- CB & Q. RAILWAY v. Drainage Comm'rs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Freeman v. Contra Costa County Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Farmers Ins. Exchange v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Hollister Park Inv. Co. v. Goleta Cty. Water Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Brown v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.