Legal Opinion

Darley v. Ward

California Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1980No. S.F. 24154PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NEWMAN, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment denying mandate to prevent reductions of service at a county-run neighborhood health clinic. We conclude that the trial court improperly excluded a major portion of the administrative record from the mandate proceeding. The judgment must therefore be reversed.

Fair Oaks is a low-income neighborhood in Redwood City. For many years the county had provided indigent health care services through a central facility, Chope Hospital in the City of San Mateo. In September 1975, after study, the board authorized creation of Fair Oaks Clinic (Fair Oaks)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alford v. PiernoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Ward v. County of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Lees v. Bay Area Air Pollution Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Woodard v. Personnel Commission of the Compton Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. San Francisco Tomorrow v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Stockinger v. Feather River Community CollegeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. Matter of Estate of ReedWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Buckley v. HolstedtWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  5. City of Sacramento v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API