Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. Paramount Oil Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 17, 1956No. Civ. 21400PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Appeal by defendant from an adverse judgment in an action for money allegedly paid for securities sold in violation of the Corporate Securities Act.

Defendant had a contract with the owner of realty in Kern County giving it the right to develop underlying oil deposits, under which the landowner’s royalty was one-eighth of all oil recovered. On February 2, 1953, defendant entered into a written contract with plaintiff which reads:

“SUB Operating, Maintenance and Drilling Agreement.
“WITNESSETH:
“1. Paramount has an Operating and Maintcmce Agreement, covering in part certain real property…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Nelson v. AbrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Spier v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Bailey v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. People v. SidwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Zumbrun v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Boyd v. BevilacquaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. James v. HerbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Pry Corp. of America v. LeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Smalley v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API