Legal Opinion

United States v. Romano

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 12, 1952PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

Defendant was indicted under 50 U.S. C.A.Appendix, § 462 for failing to take one step forward, thereby refusing to be inducted into the United States Army.

The case was tried without a jury and upon the trial the following facts developed. Defendant, who was born on May 1, 1929, is a member of the Jehovah’s Witnesses sect. Early in May, 1949 he received a Selective Service questionnaire which he answered on May IS, 1949. In the questionnaire he claimed to have been a Jehovah’s Witness since 1942 and requested exemption from service on grounds that ■he was a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. The Japanese Immigrant CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Falbo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. United States v. LaierDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. BurlichDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  2. Ex Parte FabianiDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. United States v. CorlissDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  4. United States v. StasevicDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  5. United States v. WitmerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API