Legal Opinion

United States v. Witmer

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 25, 1953No. 12244PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, District Judge.

Defendant found guilty by a jury of wilfully refusing to submit to induction into the armed forces of the United States,1 moves for judgment of acquittal. The record consists of the Selective Service file,2 testimony of the clerk of the local board and of an army officer; the latter as to the refusal to be inducted. Defendant did not testify or offer any independent testimony on his behalf.

A valid order to report for includes the duty to submit to induction. See Billings v. Truesdell, 321 U.S. 542 at page 557, 64 S.Ct. 737, 88 L.Ed. 917. While not disputing the refusal…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Burns v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Cox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Billings v. TruesdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Witmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Wiley v. WoodsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. United States v. Wayne Douglas KingCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
  4. United States v. MonroeDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1957
  5. United States v. WitmerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API