Legal Opinion

United States v. Stasevic

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 16, 1953PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOCK, District Judge.

These are four motions to quash subpoenas issued in behalf of three defendants who have been indicted for violation of the Universal Military Training and Service Act. These motions were argued and submitted together because of the similarity of the facts and issues involved and I shall therefore treat them together.

Each of the defendants Stasevic, Vincelli and Prytyskacz, is a Jehovah’s Witness who claimed exemption from military service as a conscientious objector on religious grounds. Each was finally denied such exemption, classified 1A and. ordered to report for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Dickinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. United States v. AndolschekCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  5. United States v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. William Chernekoff, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  2. United States v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
  3. United States v. Jeffrey Hale PurvisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  4. United States v. Milton Carl HesseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  5. United States v. CorlissDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API