Legal Opinion

United States v. Laier

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 8, 1943No. 28036-SPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ST. SURE, District Judge.

The Grand Jury presented an indictment against the defendant charging him with failing to report for induction under the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 301 et seq. The case was tried to the court without a jury. At the close of the trial defendant moved to dismiss the indictment on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to support the charge.

The facts are undisputed. Defendant is a registrant of Local Board No. 112 at Palo Alto, California. After he was classified by that board in class I-A he requested an opportunity to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The Japanese Immigrant CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. United States v. GriemeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  4. Bowles v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Fletcher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. FryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  2. United States v. LemkeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1969
  3. Bejelis v. United States. Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
  4. United States v. RomanoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  5. Lancaster v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API