Citizens for Growth Management v. Groscost
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZLAKET, Chief Justice.
¶ 1 This special action challenges the Arizona Legislative Council’s analysis of the Citizens Growth Management Initiative (CGMI). We considered the case without oral argument and issued an order accepting jurisdiction and granting relief on August 7, 2000. Pursuant to Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 19-124(B) (West Supp.1999), we decided that the first paragraph of the Council’s analysis should be deleted or revised to provide an impartial description of the initiative measure, free of argument or advocacy. Our order indicated that this opinion would follow.
*72¶ 2 We have…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- White v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Arkansas Tech University v. LinkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Capital Properties, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
- Sotomayor v. BurnsArizona Supreme Court · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sotomayor v. BurnsArizona Supreme Court · 2000
- Rep Andrew Tobin v. Hon ReaArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- Healthy Arizona Initiative PAC v. GroscostArizona Supreme Court · 2000
- Quality Education & Jobs Supporting I-16-2012 v. BennettArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- Arizona for Abortion Access v. MontenegroArizona Supreme Court · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.