Pillon v. Attorney General
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.
Plaintiff filed this petition in this Court for a writ of mandamus to compel the defendants attorney general, secretary of State, director of elections and the board of State canvassers to approve a certain form of a petition, “Exhibit A,” which the plaintiff had submitted to the defendants, and which he desired to circulate to obtain a sufficient number .of signatures of qualified and registered electors of the State to propose a constitutional amendment relative to garnishment. The defendants refused to approve “Exhibit A,” taking the position that the law •did not require them, or any of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Leininger v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- McLeod v. State Board of CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Janigian v. City of DearbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
- Kosiba v. Wayne County Board of AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- State Highway Commissioner v. Ottawa Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- House Speaker v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Musselman v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
- State Board of Education v. Houghton Lake Community SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
- AFSCME Council 25 v. State Employees' Retirement SystemMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- Frey v. Department of Management & BudgetMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.