Legal Opinion

Frey v. Department of Management & Budget

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1987No. Docket Nos. 81502, 81517, (Calendar No. 13)PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*318Archer, J.

In this case of first impression, we granted leave to determine whether Const 1963, art 4, § 27, applies to initiated laws enacted by the Legislature.1 If art 4, § 27 applies to initiated laws enacted by the Legislature, then those laws must receive a two-thirds vote of each house to take immediate effect. If art 4, §27, does not apply, then those laws may be given immediate effect without being passed by a two-thirds vote of each house.

We hold that art 4, § 27, does apply to initiated laws enacted by the Legislature. Therefore, since the initiative was not given immediate effect by…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Traverse City School Dist. v. Atty. Gen.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Woodland v. Michigan Citizens LobbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State Highway Commission v. VanderklootMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Price v. HopkinMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Regents of the University of Michigan v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1975

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Danse Corp. v. City of Madison HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. People v. PittsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Okrie v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Hammel v. Speaker of the House of RepresentativesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Lysogorski v. Bridgeport Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API