Frey v. Department of Management & Budget
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*318Archer, J.
In this case of first impression, we granted leave to determine whether Const 1963, art 4, § 27, applies to initiated laws enacted by the Legislature.1 If art 4, § 27 applies to initiated laws enacted by the Legislature, then those laws must receive a two-thirds vote of each house to take immediate effect. If art 4, §27, does not apply, then those laws may be given immediate effect without being passed by a two-thirds vote of each house.
We hold that art 4, § 27, does apply to initiated laws enacted by the Legislature. Therefore, since the initiative was not given immediate effect by…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Traverse City School Dist. v. Atty. Gen.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
- Woodland v. Michigan Citizens LobbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- State Highway Commission v. VanderklootMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Price v. HopkinMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- Regents of the University of Michigan v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Danse Corp. v. City of Madison HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. PittsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Okrie v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Hammel v. Speaker of the House of RepresentativesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- Lysogorski v. Bridgeport Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.