Legal Opinion
Musselman v. Governor
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 25, 1995No. Docket Nos. 97322, 97915, (Calendar No. 7)PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBoyle, J.
The question presented concerns funding of retirement health care benefits for members of the Public School Employees Retirement System. Although we find that the failure to fund these benefits as they arise violates Const 1963, art 9, § 24, we cannot grant the plaintiffs’ request for mandamus.
i
PACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The plaintiffs in these consolidated cases are current and retired public school employees who are members of the Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System (mpsers). That system, established pursuant to MCL 38.1301 et seq.; MSA 15.893(111) et seq., covers employees…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Davis v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Jacoby v. Grays Harbor Chair & Mfg. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1970
- Beecher v. BaldyMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
- Teasel v. Department of Mental HealthMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Kosa v. State TreasurerMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Ernst v. RisingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Studier v. Michigan Public School Employees' Retirement BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re Request for Advisory Opinion Regarding Constitutionality of 2011 PA 38Michigan Supreme Court · 2011
- Sorrels v. Queen of Peace HospitalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Willoughby v. GrimSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.