Legal Opinion
AFSCME Council 25 v. State Employees' Retirement System
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided August 25, 2011No. Docket Nos. 302959, 302960, 302961, and 302962PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFort Hood, J.
Defendants, the entities and individuals charged with the administration, collection, and distribution of the State Employees’ Retirement System, *4appeal as of right the Court of Claims’ decision holding that MCL 38.35, the statute requiring a three percent employee compensation contribution to finance the Public Employee Retirement Health Care Funding Act, 2010 PA 77, MCL 38.2731 to 38.2747, is unconstitutional. We affirm.
I. BASIC FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiffs1 addressed wage provisions during collective-bargaining negotiations with the state. Ultimately, the parties agreed to a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Walz v. Tax Comm'n of City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Golden v. ZwicklerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Traverse City School Dist. v. Atty. Gen.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
- Viculin v. Department of Civil ServiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- O’connell v. Director of ElectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
- Hammel v. Speaker of the House of RepresentativesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- People v. StewartMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
- AFT Michigan v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- Prime Time International Distributing Inc v. Dept of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.