Legal Opinion

Rainey v. Northwestern National Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 14, 1980No. A7806-09715, CA 14459PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*45BUTTLER, P. J.

In this action on an automobile insurance policy defendant’s denial of coverage for damage to plaintiff’s automobile was upheld. The facts are not in dispute and both parties filed Motions for Summary Judgment. The court granted defendant’s Motion and denied plaintiff’s. Plaintiff appeals. We reverse.

Plaintiff was issued an automobile insurance policy by defendant covering his 1976 Pontiac. In addition to other coverage, the policy afforded coverage for collision, theft and malicious mischief. It also included a Driver Limitation endorsement which excluded coverage when the car…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Musulin v. Woodtek, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Gowans v. Northwestern Pacific Indemnity Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Nugent v. Union Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  4. PE Ashton Company v. JoynerUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  5. American Economy Insurance Co. v. CommonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. SCHOOL DIST. NO. 1, ETC. v. Mission Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  2. Omark Industries v. Safeco Ins. Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1984
  3. Crunk v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  4. R.D. Offutt Co. v. Lexington InsuranceDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2004
  5. Seales v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API