Legal Opinion

PE Ashton Company v. Joyner

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1965No. 10254PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLISTER, Justice:

Third party plaintiff, Joyner, appeals from a judgment holding that United Pacific Insurance Company, third party defendant, was not liable under the insurance policy for damages to Joyner’s truck.

Joyner, the owner of a pickup truck, purchased insurance which included coverage for “theft” of his vehicle. The policy also contained an exclusionary rider which specified that no insurance is afforded the named insured, while any vehicle covered by the policy is being operated, maintained or used by or under the control of any driver under the age of 25 other than Rosa-lee…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Indemnity Fire Corp. v. AldridgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  2. Toms v. Hartford Fire Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Handley v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New YorkUtah Supreme Court · 1944
  4. National Fire Insurance v. SlaydenMississippi Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Jorgensen v. Hartford Fire Insurance CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. SandtUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. MacHinery Center, Inc. And the Continental Bank and Trust Company v. Anchor National Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  3. Pacific Indemnity Company v. KohlhaseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. Steinbach v. Continental Western Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  5. Fuller v. Director of FinanceUtah Supreme Court · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API