Legal Opinion
Omark Industries v. Safeco Ins. Co. of America
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided June 12, 1984No. Civ. 83-877-PAPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PANNER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Omark Industries, Inc. (Omark), claims that defendant, Safeco Insurance Company of America (Safeco), wrongfully refused Omark’s tender of defense of an employment discrimination case filed against it by three former and one current female employees. Omark brings this action to recover its costs of defending and settling the underlying lawsuit. Safe-co moves for summary judgment and Omark for partial summary judgment. I grant Safeeo’s motion. Omark’s motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
Safeco issued to Omark a general liability insurance policy, No.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ferguson v. Birmingham Fire Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- McGarrah v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
- I-L Logging Co. v. Manufacturers & Wholesalers Indemnity ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Casey v. Northwestern Security Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- SCHOOL DIST. NO. 1, ETC. v. Mission Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. CowanTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- E-Z Loader Boat Trailers, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- SL Industries, Inc. v. American Motorists InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- American Motorists Insurance v. L-C-A Sales Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- American & For. Ins. v. Church Sch., Diocese of Va.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.