Legal Opinion

Gowans v. Northwestern Pacific Indemnity Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1971PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is an action against an insurance company under a policy insuring for “loss by theft” to recover money paid by the insured as a reward for the return of stolen jewelry covered by the policy.

Defendant admitted the theft of the jewelry and payment of the reward for its return, but denied that plaintiffs were entitled to recover the amount of that payment as a “loss by theft.” It is stipulated that both the value of the stolen jewelry and the amount of the reward paid for its return were in excess of the $2,000 limit of the coverage provided by the insurance policy.

The case was tried before…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Northwest Acceptance CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Housner v. Baltimore-American InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Alamo Casualty Co. v. LairdCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  4. Ausman v. EAGLE FIRE INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Oppenheimer v. Baker & WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Graham v. Public Employees Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. SAFECO INSURANCE CO. OF AM. v. HirschmannWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Shadbolt v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. A-1 Sandblasting & Steamcleaning Co. v. BaidenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. Allstate Insurance v. HandegardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API