Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Wright v. Suydam

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1913No. 10627PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered April 29, 1912, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for specific performance, after a trial to the court on the merits.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

This action was commenced on May 16, 1910, by W. Hammond Wright against Hendrick Suydam, to enforce specific performance of the following written contract:

“Received of W. Hammond Wright the sum of one hundred dollars as part payment upon purchase price of the following described real estate with the appurtenances thereto, situate in King county, state of Washington, to wit: . . . the balance of the purchase price of the said premises is seventy-nine hundred dollars to be paid in cash, upon delivery of deed. The undersigned owners of said premises agree within fifty days to deliver to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Frye & BruhnWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Western Timber Co. v. Kalama River Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Brown v. MungerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  4. Neeson v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Dean v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Alexander v. LewesWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Asia Investment Co. v. LevinWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Schalk Chemical Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
  4. Fast v. WhitneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Vance v. RobertsSupreme Court of Florida · 1928

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API