Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Hudson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 5, 1980No. 32PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

The sole issue presented in this appeal is when may attorney’s fees properly be awarded in an alimony and child support case.

The award of attorney’s fees in an alimony action is governed by G.S. 50-16.4. The award of attorney’s fees in child custody and/or support actions is governed by G.S. 50-13.6.

G.S. 50-16.4 provides that:

“At any time that a dependent spouse would be entitled to alimony pendente lite pursuant to G.S. 50-16.3, the court may, upon application of such spouse, enter an order for reasonable counsel fees for the benefit of such spouse, to be paid and secured…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Bunn v. BunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Fuchs v. FuchsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Eudy v. EudySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Rowe v. RoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Falls v. FallsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Coastal Production Credit Ass'n v. Goodson Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API