Holloway v. . Holloway
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBaeNHILL, J.
'In determining the question presented on this appeal
it may be well to briefly review the instances in which a wife is entitled to alimony pendente lite and counsel fees and the law in respect thereto : (1) On a motion for alimony pendente lite and counsel fees in an action instituted by a wife against her husband under the provisions of C. S., 1666, whether the wife is entitled to alimony is a question of law upon the facts found, and the court below must find the facts, upon request. Moore v. Moore, 130 N. C., 333, 41 S. E., 943; McManus v. McManus, 191 N. C., 740, 133 S. E., 9; Caudle v.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- McManus v. . McManusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Price v. . PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Medlin v. . MedlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Reeves v. . ReevesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Rickert v. RickertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Byers v. . ByersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Byers v. ByersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Schloss v. SchlossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.