Legal Opinion
Bolick v. Roberts
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided March 29, 2002No. 3:99CV755PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD L. WILLIAMS, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs Clint Bolick and Robin Heat-wole, individual consumers of wine, beer and distilled spirits, and plaintiffs Dry Co-mal Creek Winery, Miura Vineyards, and Hood River Vineyard, all out-of-state growers and producers of wine, brought this action against the defendants, Clarence Roberts, Sandra Canada, and Clater Mottinger, in their official capacities as appointed members of the Virginia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board (ABC Board or Board), challenging Virginia’s regulatory scheme involving the shipment and distribution of…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Brooks v. VassarCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Dickerson v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Imaginary Images, Inc. v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- Heald v. EnglerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Bolick v. DanielsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.