Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Vassar

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 11, 2006No. 05-1540, 05-1541, 05-1791PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and dismissed in part, vacated and remanded by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Judge TRAXLER concurred except as to Part III.B and Judge GOODWIN concurred except as to Parts III and IV. Judge TRAXLER wrote an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. Judge GOODWIN wrote an opinion concurring in Parts I, II, and V and dissenting from Parts III and IV.

OPINION

NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge:

This appeal involves a facial challenge, under the dormant Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, to various aspects of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Jerome Williams v. Jon OzmintCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  2. Incumaa v. OzmintCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
  4. Family Winemakers of California v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  5. TRI-M GROUP, LLC v. SharpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API