Legal Opinion

Bolick v. Danielson

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 29, 2003No. 02-1367, 02-1368PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The plaintiffs, two Virginia wine and beer consumers and wineries based in Texas, California, and Oregon, commenced this action against officials of the Commonwealth of Virginia, challenging the constitutionality of Virginia’s Alcoholic Beverage Control (“ABC”) laws, Va.Code § 4.1-100 et seq., which prohibit the importation of wine and beer into Virginia except through a regulated, multi-tiered structure. The plaintiffs alleged that portions of these laws, even though adopted ostensibly pursuant to the Twenty-first Amendment, are unconstitutional by virtue of the dormant Commerce…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beskind v. EasleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
  2. Bolick v. RobertsDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2002

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brooks v. VassarCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
  2. Dickerson v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  3. Imaginary Images, Inc. v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  4. Heald v. EnglerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  5. Heal D v. EnglerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API