Heald v. Engler
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judge.
In this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the plaintiffs raise a constitutional challenge to Michigan’s alcohol distribution system, contending that state provisions differentiating between instate and out-of-state wineries violate the Commerce Clause. 1 Those regulations prohibit the direct shipment of alcoholic beverages from out-of-state wineries, while allowing in-state wineries to ship directly to consumers, provided that the in-state wineries comply with certain minimal regulatory requirements. The plaintiffs, who include wine…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- City of Philadelphia v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hughes v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. DiasSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- New Energy Co. of Indiana v. LimbachSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Granholm v. HealdSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Clayton Byrd v. Tenn. Wine & Spirits Retailers Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Swedenburg v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Swedenburg v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Heald v. GranholmDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.