Christy Corporation v. The United States, and Harco Engineering, a Division of Harbor Boat Building Company, Third-Party
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
COWEN, Chief Judge.
This case presents a question of the scope of this court’s jurisdiction over third parties impleaded under Section 14 (b) of the Contract Settlement Act of 1944, 41 U.S.C. § 114(b) (1964). The relevant facts are as follows:
Plaintiff Christy is a corporation engaged in the shipbuilding business. It contracted to construct a research oceanographic vessel for the Department of the Interior, Bureau of Commercial Fisheries. Plaintiff alleges that defendant impliedly warranted the plans and specifications for the vessel to be correct and complete, that in fact there were basic…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- Oliver-Finnie Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- Richfield Oil Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
- Seaboard Surety Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
- Lloyd G. Bishop v. The United States, and Bahamas Airways, Ltd., Third-Party Charles R. Challandes v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hoopa Valley Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Sun Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company, American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc., Third-Party Intervenor v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Bowser, Inc. v. The United States and General Steel Tank Co., Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Wolfchild v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Yaist v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.