Legal Opinion

Lloyd G. Bishop v. The United States, and Bahamas Airways, Ltd., Third-Party Charles R. Challandes v. The United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 21, 1966No. 150-63, 192-64PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARAMORE, Judge.

In these actions 15 plaintiffs claim additional compensation for services rendered after regular hours and on Sundays and holidays. They base their claims on the Act of March 2, 1931, chapter 368, 46 Stat. 1467, as amended, 5 U.S. C. §§ 342c-342d (1964 Ed.). They have already received one and one-half times their basic wage rate for these services under the provisions of the Federal Employees Pay Act of 1945, chapter 212, 59 Stat. 295, 296, as amended, 5 U.S.C. §§ 901-911 (1964 Ed.). The defendant asks that the petition be dismissed, but asserts in the alternative that if it…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Gibney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1949
  3. Canadian Pac. Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  4. O'Rourke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
  5. Renner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Christy Corporation v. The United States, and Harco Engineering, a Division of Harbor Boat Building Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  2. Laurens L. Delano v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  3. ChallandesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  4. Laurens L. Delano v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  5. Laurens L. Delano v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API