Heller v. Norcal Mutual Insurance
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LUCAS, C. J.
—In this case we consider whether unauthorized ex parte discussions that occur during the discovery phase of a medical malpractice action between a nonparty treating physician and the defendant physician’s malpractice insurer, regarding the litigant patient’s medical condition, violate either the Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (Civ. Code, § 56 et seq.; all statutory references are to this code unless otherwise indicated), or the constitutional right to privacy (Cal. Const., art. I, § 1).
We granted review to consider whether plaintiff’s seventh and eighth causes…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Cortez v. Purolator Air Filtration Products Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Coast Plaza Doctors Hospital v. Blue CrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Ludwig v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Loder v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.