Legal Opinion

Loder v. City of Glendale

California Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1997No. S043548PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, C. J.

In this case we address a challenge to an employment-related drug testing program adopted by the City of Glendale in 1986. Under the program in question, all individuals who conditionally have been offered new positions with the city (both newly hired persons and current city employees who have been approved for promotion to a new position) are required to undergo urinalysis testing for a variety of illegal drugs and alcohol as part of a preplacement medical examination that the city traditionally has conducted prior to hiring or promotion. The drug testing requirement…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. American Academy of Pediatrics v. LungrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Shulman v. Group W Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
  3. NBC Subsidiary (KNBC-TV), Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. In re Yahoo Mail LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  5. In re iPhone Application Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2012

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API