Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Thomas

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1944No. Civ. No. 14441PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

Plaintiff instituted this action against defendant on July 20, 1943. By her complaint she asked for a dissolution of the “bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant; for the payment by defendant for plaintiff’s support and maintenance of the sum of $130 per month pursuant to the property settlement agreement of the parties”; and for attorney’s fees “pendente lite and at the time of trial.” By the terms of the property settlement between them, the enforcement of which was also sought in plaintiff’s complaint, the parties each transferred to the other, certain community…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Loveren v. LoverenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Westphal v. WestphalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Feickert v. FeickertNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  4. Bancroft v. BancroftCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. People v. StokesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Colbert v. ColbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Perrenoud v. PerrenoudSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  3. Redsted v. WeissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. El Dorado Irrigation District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. City of Fresno v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API