Legal Opinion
Mission Insurance v. Cash, Sullivan & Cross
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 21, 1992No. 1 CA-CV 90-031PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROOKS, Presiding Judge.
Mission Insurance Company (Mission) has appealed from the trial court’s denial of its motion for relief from judgment under Rule 60(c)(6), Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, and its alternative motion for permission to refile its complaint under A.R.S. section 12-504, the “savings statute." 1 We find no abuse of discretion and therefore affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On April 30, 1986, Mission filed an action against Cash, Sullivan & Cross, an insurance agency, and its agent, William J. Murphy (collectively “CSC”), alleging that Murphy’s misrepresentation…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. Salvatore Cirami, Salvatore Cirami & Margaret CiramiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Daley v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Carroll v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1982
- Coconino Pulp and Paper Company v. MarvinArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- Orange Empire National Bank v. KirkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ezell v. QuonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Panzino v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 2000
- Bed Mart, Inc. v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Haynes v. Syntek Finance Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- McKernan v. DupontCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.