Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Burford

California Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1931No. Docket No. L.A. 10557PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

This cause is before us upon an order of transfer after decision by the District Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, reversing the judgment.

In addition to our independent consideration, we have adopted a portion of the opinion of said District Court of Appeal, by Haines, J., pro tern., as expressing our view on the subject as to the sufficiency of the amended complaint, as well as for the argument and citation of authorities which it contains.

Plaintiffs Duff S. Hansen and Hans Hansen, copartners, doing business under the firm name of Hansen Lumber Company, sued in assumpsit to recover…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Coward v. ClantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Pike v. ZadigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Westcott v. GilmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Harrison v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Nofsinger v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Nelson v. AbrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Engineering Service Corp. v. Longridge Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Oakley v. RosenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Shook v. BealsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API